Victory-class Star Destroyer WIP#1

Commissioned piece.
I’m using the old McQuarrie and Cantwell concept designs and mixing in elements from the Venator, ISD, and existing Victory depictions.
The goals are:
1) It should bridge the Venator and the Devastator in appearance. I know the Venator didn’t exist when the first VSDs were being drawn, but we have Venators now, so I think we should use parts of that design lineage since Victories were supposed to be contemporaries of the Venators
2) It should NOT look like an underfed ISD – this is one of my biggest gripes with the VSD depictions out there at the moment
3) The extra knobbly bits that were added to the basic star destroyer archetype should look integrated and *designed* to be there. I’m talking about the wings, the projecting box holding the bridge, and the stalks off the tower and such.
vsd2 vsd3 vsd1

Leave a Reply

17 Comments on "Victory-class Star Destroyer WIP#1"

avatar
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Jacob
Guest

Might you ever make a Venator Class, if not traditional coloring then maybe with imperial paint scheme. Having you make one would be epic.

Tanz
Guest

Amazing work as always. It’s great to be seeing a Victory Class.

Burntstrobe
Guest

comment image/revision/latest?cb=20081117221723

different take on the bridge?

Found this to be interesting for referencing the wings:
comment image

As always, I am curious and eager to see how your work develops, we did not follow true cannon with our version of the Victory either, but our’s is the MK3 version at Yuuzhan Vong at War Mod:
http://www.moddb.com/mods/yuuzhan-vong-at-war/images/victory-mk3-star-destroyer

gorkmalork
Guest

That’s not a bad Vic-III at all; those MTLs(?) framing the reactor bulb seem a little close, but otherwise I can dig a destroyer with some ventral punch. Plus, snazzy bow-trench battery & extra sensor dome on the command tower’s neck.

Mikeystu
Guest

So happy! I trust you, mr fractal, to do this design the justice that has been lacking for so long. Looking forward to the results!

William Parker
Guest
Yay! I was actually just wondering what your next project would be and if it would be the Victory class. It is one of those older SW designs that goes back a long way but isn’t covered very well. I agree that the bridge tower of the Victory does seem rather haphazard and it doesn’t look like it was changed between the Victory-I and Victory-II class. I’m interested to see what you do with this design and look forward to seeing how you go about designing and modelling a ship. I actually just found this site recently thanks to Pinterest,… Read more »
Anonymous
Guest

It will have 2 big engins or 3? I enjoy to imagine that Vic-I has 2 and Vic-II 3.

Anonymous
Guest

Also, about bridge – don’t very like Venator bridge cause two bridges close together are stupid for me, I think this part can be look like bridgre in Imperial ii-class frigate for me it really looks like that this ship evolved from Venator and Acclamatorcomment image/revision/latest?cb=20081205041451

About “wings” – don’t like them wings, it stupid I think. They can be more “inside” ship like thiscomment image/revision/latest?cb=20150111153433 and open not for atmospheric stuff, but they close hangar inside, like hangars in venator that was open.

Also, another Victory-class pic that I likecomment image/revision/latest?cb=20160721023340

Sorry for all that if I’am anoying, I VERY MUCH like that class, and

Astro1derboy
Guest

I really enjoy seeing these early-on foundation-renders. It’s nice to see that establishing a solid foundation now helps really solidify the final product. All of your work is just staggering in detail-level and contemplative design. You can tell that parts haven’t haphazardly been thrown on to fill space. Each placement is given much deliberation and consideration. Your results clearly speak for themselves. I am so going to enjoy this beauty come together (as with all the others). Great work as usual!!

Astro1derboy
Guest

…enjoy watching this beauty come together, that is. 🙂

gorkmalork
Guest

Solid start WRT the bridge module & ‘wing’ extensions-I take it the latter are intended to mask this puppy’s outsized warhead array, though extra repulsors/maneuvering jets *might* fit along the upper & lower surfaces. As for energy weaponry, a row of Procursator-style superfiring dorsal turrets & some heavy brim-notch ball guns (HTL? Ion?) might help to further differentiate ‘your’ Vic from its Impstar cousins. Finally, wouldn’t mind your paring the horizontal bridge antennae down five or six notches-that big one from the original Vehicles & Vessels guide looks like something kludged off a scaled-up X-wing.

Daniel Shenise
Guest
Couple thoughts. Good breakdown of a coherent design program for the ship. I’ve always thought the wings were a little small, especially from the original SD concept art. I thought it might make sense for the wings to be variable extensions of the lower hull primarily, not the upper, and that they would be mostly armored banks of repulsor drives to improve atmospheric handling. I’m thinking that as far as really big ships go, this thing should handle like a Lotus in atmosphere. I would also have more prominent ventral armament, nothing crazy, but maybe 4 of the large double… Read more »
Sean
Guest

The venators double-bridge design was made for coordinating it’s ~492 starfighters. The Vic only carries 24 if I’m not mistaken.

Lord Vader
Guest

YES YES YES 🙂

AdmiralStrang
Guest

IT BEGINS

Chris
Guest

just my $0.02….since it is a contemporary of the Venator…possibly the same weapons systems as the Venator….but with more missile launchers as it does not have the fighter capacity of the Venator.

Sean
Guest

YES PLEASE

I LOVE VICTORY-CLASS SDs

After this, could you model a Gladiator-class? They were meant to be Victory-class escorts.

Alternatively, an MC-140 “Scythe” would also be incredibly sexy with you modelling it.

I wish I had your modeling skill.