Leave a Reply

20 Comments on "Victory-class Star Destroyer WIP#9"

avatar
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Brad Knowles
Guest

Okay, so the guns we see in close-up on the port side are … what?

The barrels don’t seem to be long enough to be turbolasers….

Anditesh Ordo
Guest

This looks sick, would love to see all the work you made put into a Modded version of EAW FOC. That way we could see how the ships really handle at their right specs of weapons. Would be cool to see a Venator, Acclamator, Aggressor-Class Destroyer, Vengeance Class Frigate, and the Keldabe

Anditesh Ordo
Guest

I didn’t get to finish, I would love to see the ships listed above in my previous chat in a full form with more accurate weapons etc. I know those ships can have a bit more on them, at least the EAW FOC ships. I do love the work you do Fractalsponge! Can’t wait to see more. Also just curious do you plan on getting a team together to create more content of the Star Wars Galaxy of Ships and other vehicles?

Billy Reeves
Guest

What are the demensions of this star destroyer like length,width and height?

Corausr
Guest

the length of an vic is 900m not quite sure about width and height though but could imagine something of 400 to 500 m

gorkmalork
Guest

Ah, eight twin HTLs in all-that’s honestly more energy-weapon punch than I expected for this Vic-I revision, with a slightly better aft-arc than either mark of Impstar to boot. Missile batteries do seem alarmingly close to said mains in the event of a golden-BB hit, but perhaps that could be mitigated by launching from whichever flank *isn’t* facing an alert opponent.

Chris
Guest

Seeing those lighter quads on the side originally made me think he was holding out on us when it came to armament.

On a side note…I have always felt that the SDs were skimped on when it came to ventral firepower….and seeing the DS in the R1 trailers with the main laser pointed downwards just set that more in my mind.

gorkmalork
Guest

Point re: ventral guns, though the ventral side on Imperial destroyer designs also features two rather large soft spots (hangar & exposed reactor portion), and as such mounting your mains on the opposite surface *might* keep said tender bits out of trouble when trading fire with comparable foes.

Chris
Guest

However having no guns there means that those tender bits an easier target for enemies. I am not saying give them the heavy dual turrets but something to keep people from hitting an easy target.

gorkmalork
Guest

Well, while I’m unsure about an Impstar’s ventral medium-turbolaser count, there seem to be enough light guns down there for chewing up corvettes & giving frigates a rough time. And heavy missile-armed craft like the Vic or FS’ Dreadnaught refit could target would-be flankers from any angle, though projectiles have their drawbacks (comparatively slow, possibly targetable/jammable, etc.). Incidentally, you might dig Burntstrobe’s take on the Victory III: http://www.moddb.com/mods/yuuzhan-vong-at-war/images/victory-mk3-star-destroyer

Kris Huckle
Guest

Really cool do far! So much better looking than the canon one imo.
Are you following the canon armament or just make something up that seems appropriate
also, do you think you’ll ever do a TaggeCo modular taskforce cruiser or another custom walker?