53
Leave a Reply

avatar
24 Comment threads
29 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
17 Comment authors
x1Wolf101xsdfhg9th-StormtrooperAnonymousTanz Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
sdfhg
Guest
sdfhg

What do the things that open up on the side do?

x1Wolf101x
Guest
x1Wolf101x

I believe that they hold missiles

Anonymous
Guest

So in Wookiepedia the Victory 1 was also known as Victoria 1 but nobody know where the source reference for the name is.

9th-Stormtrooper
Guest
9th-Stormtrooper

Hey Fractal,
i have a question about the firepower of the Providence class. It has 14 Quad TL of 1terratons each, right? But how is it possible that the ship can counter the Victory’s 9 TL of 70terratons?
Sry for my very bad english.
Lg Stormi

Anonymous
Guest

So fractal what is the diameter of one of the 80 heavy missile launchers?

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

How does the Victory class star destroyer fair against the Procursator class star destroyer?

Tanz
Guest
Tanz

The Victory looks beautiful. Such great work.

PanchoRad
Guest
PanchoRad

I started to remake this one in Blender from the pictures… The Victory Class 2 is larger, right? Trying to make them in 270:1 scale…

Sephiroth0812
Guest
Sephiroth0812

Both classes are 900 meters long and have very similar hull design just like the ISD I and ISD II have only minor differences appearance-wise. The main differences between the Victory I which was also used by the Clone Wars-Republic and the Victory II which is an Imperial-only ship are in terms of armament, engines and armor. The Victory II doesn’t have the massive missile batteries but some Ion Cannons instead, better armor (due to less storage room needed with no missiles) and most importantly better engines. The main “weakness” of the Victory I are its undepowered sublight-engines which make… Read more »

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

so do you think of making a victory 2 class star destroyer which is like this ship but without the missiles tubes and have more turbolasers and ion cannons?

PanchoRad
Guest
PanchoRad

Is the 3d model available? I am tempted to try creating a large papercraft model out of it…

Jacob
Guest

Have you ever considered building a Venator Star Destroyer? Just a thought.

Hayabusa1138
Guest
Hayabusa1138

Nice work, but it looks a bit off, to be honest. That said, that feeling could very well be from seeing it in a realistic way compared to comic pages, etc.

Joannes808
Guest
Joannes808

I absolutely love it!

Would it be possible to have an updated set of orthos posts from Assertor down to Intersector-class on different scaled images for better size reference with the new additions?

Xeno
Guest
Xeno

I’d want that!

someone
Guest
someone

you should do an eclipse class star destroyer

Arvenski
Guest
Arvenski

Wow. That’s amazing. I love how the protruding covers on the missile tubes make the outline of the hull reminiscent of that of the Venator. Even if unintentional, I think that’s a nice little nod to the Victory’s Republic heritage. 🙂

gorkmalork
Guest
gorkmalork

Snazzy missile-support & guidance structures, solid energy-weapon battery, evenly-distributed antennae, distinctive bridge & even hull shape (distinctly less bow taper than Impstars), sensibly-proportioned ventral hangar, and some especially neat thruster-nozzle detailing. Successful revision indeed-can’t thank you nearly enough for sharing.

Daniel Shenise
Guest

Still trying to get over how good it looks in shots 2, 16, and 19. It’s an exceptionally good representation of this ship. Really nothing else has come close to looking this good.

Chris
Guest
Chris

Amazing work. As always. But I think something is missing….a Gladiator-class to escort her.

gorkmalork
Guest
gorkmalork

Methinks a quartet of our host’s Kontos frigates would do at least as well. In the event anyone gets around to rendering that FFG product, I’d strongly suggest some bow-taper revision; as is, the Gladiator’s dorsal/ventral profile seems far too rectangular for my tastes.

Adm. Drakkmar
Guest
Adm. Drakkmar

I like the inclusion of the axial turret emplacements.

Astro1derboy
Guest
Astro1derboy

Holy crap this is awesome!! Again . . . VERY well done!!

Daniel Shenise
Guest

Best representation of this ship I’ve seen. Well done. The turbolift maintenance department might get a lot of overtime with that change plane from main hull to the neck/superstructure though. 😏

slowsmerf
Guest

I noticed that too, but I would guess he did it intentionally. It’s the same on the Star Destroyer in the logo above.

gejemica
Guest
gejemica

It’s actually like that on *every* Star Destroyer 😉

gejemica
Guest
gejemica
slowsmerf
Guest
slowsmerf

Not according to these blueprints: http://theforce.net/swtc/isd.html#dimensions

slowsmerf
Guest
slowsmerf

Looking at some photos of the original model I tend to agree (google ‘star destroyer original prop’).

jonathan
Guest
jonathan

its beautiful.

slowsmerf
Guest

Finally a befitting representation of the Victory Star Destroyer! I do like the idea of the ‘wings’ as protective cover for its missile armament. On my wishlist would be a variant that brings back that elongated feature on the bridge tower, although I have no good explanation of what function it could have.

Anditesh Ordo
Guest
Anditesh Ordo

Awesome. Can’t wait to see other ships of your genius!!! Hoping for some EAW FOC ships!, Heck even a Venator or Acclamator would be awesome.

Xeno
Guest
Xeno

Absolutely glorious.