125
Leave a Reply

avatar
23 Comment threads
102 Thread replies
6 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
36 Comment authors
EricTheIcthalaNaradusStormCommandoAnon Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Ryadra777
Guest

So Fractal looking at the underneath of the Allegiance’s bridge why didn’t it have complex greebles like the Imperator and the Bellator?

Like these for example:
Imperator:comment image
Bellator:comment image

Eric
Guest
Eric

Quick question…Is it ok to make a print out and frame one of your awesome renders for person viewing? I recently saw someone use it in a Youtube video and was wondering if I would need permission to have someone print one for me or if it is strictly off limits. I respect your work too much to just take it and if it was allowed I would like permission 🙂 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZCCvUB5n74 @ 13min if interested).

StormCommando
Guest
StormCommando

How would this stack up against the Resurgent?

All kyber crystal shenanigans aside, I think that this would win – it’s a lot bulkier. And the ICS for the Resurgent doesn’t do it any good – the reactor in that image is tiny…

Which makes you wonder – how do ‘compact hypermatter reactors’ stack up against normal hypermatter reactors in output to volume ratio? It can’t be that much better or all warships would have compact reactors.

TheIcthala
Guest
TheIcthala

I suspect that ‘compact hypermatter reactors’ were developed by the First Order/Kuat Entralla Engineering and their technology is a jealously guarded secret. I have nothing to base this on, but if it’s true, it would explain why no one else uses them. I don’t have the ICS with me, so I can’t check anything tight now.
Regarding Resurgent vs Allegiance, I guess it depends on how well the reactors match up.

Naradus
Guest
Naradus

How long did this take, and in what software did you model this? I’d be interested in knowing.

Ryadra777
Guest

Ok Fractal since you may didn’t saw the question that I have posted i’l ask again.
What the polygon count for the new Allegiance?

DarthKarnage
Guest
DarthKarnage

I would love it if you had a shot from the bridge viewport area , just so we could see what it would be a little like commanding this ship…

Just a thought.

wusolja
Guest
wusolja

@Jonathan C

41 dual defense turrets pointing aft
53 dual defense turrets each, pointing left and right
17 dual defense turrets pointing forward
6 quad turrets ventral
16 quad turrets each, pointing left and right
3 quad turrets pointing forward
12 quad turrets pointing aft
9 ball turrets total (ion guns?)
6 Heavy quad guns each, pointing left and right

seems like the total armament for this ship!/?

Ragnrok
Guest
Ragnrok

That 14th shot is so epic!

PhantomFury
Guest
PhantomFury

Oh man what a beautiful ship…

OmegaS
Guest
OmegaS

‘Lets shoe horn a star cruiser into as small a hull as possible’, the ship. Beyond the lack of flexibility, I imagine that it has well above average maintenance and logistical requirements for something its volume. If you have a fleet large enough to justify a relative specialist like this, it can work well, but only if you have an actual need for it. Generally, the Empire needed coverage above all else, which its obsession with big ships didn’t help with. Rather than the ISDs, a far lesser number of Allegiances supported by a far larger fleet of sub-capitals would… Read more »

Hecatomb
Guest
Hecatomb

I personally think this is what the First Order destroyer should have been. Not a completely new design, but late-generation Imperial warships that eluded the New Republic following the battle of Endor. It would have made much more sense for the First Order to build its fleet from the Imperial Remnant, and perhaps we could have then seen the Bellator and Assertor on screen.

PhantomFury
Guest
PhantomFury

I mean, we get enough (justified, in my opinion) complaints about First Order assets resembling Imperial gear too much and if this showed up on the big screen, I’ll rant even harder. However, I love this design and I wouldn’t mind seeing it from an expanded universe source, though.

Anon
Guest
Anon

Except Disney blatantly rejected anything of the Expanded Universe with common sense out the waste-chute of their dumb-ass corporate empire. They refused to look at what could have been salvaged and made up their usual mickey mouse crap.

Jonathan C
Guest
Jonathan C

Can’t wait for some committed soul to count all the guns on this one. (particularly the medium quads and pd combos)

Twitcheh
Guest
Twitcheh

There are at least 20.

Steve
Guest
Steve

I’d say more than four *nods*

PhantomFury
Guest
PhantomFury

I mean, if we want to be accurate, greater than or equal to 1 is the number you want.

PhantomFury
Guest
PhantomFury

234 point-defense seems considerably less than what goes through my head for a ship nearly twice the size of ISD for some reason…

STONEhenk
Guest
STONEhenk

~2.5 times ISD volume. Don’t know how that translates to surface but his ISD redux has 83 point-defense turrets. So it seems considerably more.

Chris Bradshaw
Guest
Chris Bradshaw

Don’t forget that larger MTL and even HTL batteries can engage fighters with those flak bursts we always see, even if their efficacy at hitting named characters is in the toilet.

AlexHurlbut
Guest
AlexHurlbut

I always thought the flak bursts were from the laser bolts impacting their shields without punching through.

CRMcNeill
Guest
CRMcNeill

Or energy blasts impacting with debris.

Adam J
Guest
Adam J

Speaking of Cross-Sections, do you have any plans on making some on here for your more custom designs?

Chris Bradshaw
Guest
Chris Bradshaw

Well we would expect the Lucrehulk as a converted freighter rather than a dedicated warship to be proportionally under-armed and poorly optimized for combat. Besides, an Allegiance without a fighter complement is far more vulnerable to fighter attack and thus reliant on PD than a Lucrehulk with ten thousand vultures.

Phoenixx
Guest
Phoenixx

That’s true Fractal but it was only the pre-war variant that had only 42 quad turbolasers.

The actual war lucrehulk had about 700-800 weapons on it.

Daib
Guest
Daib

Would we ever see you mount a missile-based PD system, like SeaRAM, or just pure gun fits?

Chris Bradshaw
Guest
Chris Bradshaw

I wanted to say that the Star Wars aesthetic is supposed to be WW2 in Space, not Cold War gone Hot in Space, but then I remembered that the Unrotated Projectile and the Henschel Hs 297 Föhn were a thing. Carry on.

rodney
Guest
rodney

Sir, do you have any plans or are you working on the executor? I like this ship very much

TheEpicDude
Guest
TheEpicDude

this is truly amazing, love it

Steven Cross
Guest
Steven Cross

whilst I know the Alliegiance class is a real thing in canon, this is my headcanon take on Fractal’s version. Thoughts and comments are most welcome! Allegiance class Battlecruiser The so called ‘Heavy Star Destroyer Project’ came about due to a doctrinal holdover from the Clone Wars. In the Clone Wars the Republic navy used the Venator class as its general purpose craft and deployed the Victory class Star Destroyer as a pure anti-ship vessel. The Victory’s greater firepower and durability let it outlast and outgun CIS Warships, even larger ships like the Lucrehulk and Providence class ships were outgunned… Read more »

PhantomFury
Guest
PhantomFury

Excellent headcanon! I just thought that perhaps instead of dating the origin back to the days of the Clone Wars, perhaps the origin should have its roots in the Tarkin Doctrine? After all inciting fear and the concept of capital ship superiority is a result of such ideology.

Steve
Guest
Steve

Oooh I like that idea Phantom 😀

Jonathan C
Guest
Jonathan C

Ahh very nice. I thought I remembered the three center ball cannons mentioned as superheavy 600-700 TT turbolasers though. If that is the case, than the 4 (2 on each side) ball mounts perhaps have triple ions in them, with the center side ball mounts having quad 150-250 TT turbos in them.

CRMcNeill
Guest
CRMcNeill

Because of the difference in naming conventions, I would think an Allegiance would be a Rendili project. All of the KDY ships are agent nouns (as in, an entity that performs an action) – Imperator, Venator, Acclamator, Tector, Executor, etc. – whereas Victory and Allegiance are both abstract nouns (as in, referring to an idea, quality or condition).

Chris Bradshaw
Guest
Chris Bradshaw

So we’re just discounting the Eclipse, Nebulon-B, Vigil, Star Galleon, Pelta, Ton-Falk, Arquitens, Broadside, Vengeance, and whatever the Arc Hammer was? KDY makes plenty of ships that don’t follow that convention.

CRMcNeill
Guest
CRMcNeill

I suppose it depends on what degree of chaotic schizophrenia you’re willing to accept from the EU.

Daib
Guest
Daib

I don’t think you can get more canon than the Nebulon B, and the Pelta/Arquitens come pretty close.

CRMcNeill
Guest
CRMcNeill

Naming conventions shift based on size/mission of craft. A Navy could easily feature both large capital ships classified by agency nouns and dinky convoy escorts classified by numeric designators, like the Royal Navy’s alphabet series. The Allegiance is close enough in size to things like the Imperator, Venator, Secutor, etc, to be part of the same “type” insofar as naming convention.

And the backstory of the Pelta / Arquitens stem from the same story group that made the MC75 from Rogue One a converted building, so again, it’s up to you how much chaotic schizophrenia you want to accept.

Anon
Guest
Anon

TBH, the Arc Hammer was a specialist factory ship. It only existed to be a mobile space-borne factory for the DT program. I refer to it as the term used by Command and Conquer; M.C.V. (Mobile Construction Vehicle.) But more of a specialized mobile droid barracks for specific autonomous non-organic infantry.

StormCommando
Guest
StormCommando

Great background, sounds very plausible. Bit of a mistake at the beginning though, imo: you say the Victory could go toe to toe with the Lucrehulk – did you mean 1 on 1? If so, this is underestimating the LH. Based on the size of all its reactors, its listed shield strength and its weapons, its power output is almost certainly around 7.7e25w – making it 8 times more powerful than an ISD-II (while 22 times bigger, it has a much lower overall:reactor volume ratio because it’s a carrier and its ‘mandibles’ are enormous, with none of that space dedicated… Read more »

gorkmalork
Guest
gorkmalork

Fair assessment WRT cruiser-refitted Lucrehulks being more than a single Vic (or even a Vic+-Venator 2-ship) should be expected to slug it out with, though I suspect a deftly-helmed Allegiance could just about solo one depending on who gets off the first telling volley.

Chris Bradshaw
Guest
Chris Bradshaw

Lucrehulks have sizable reactors, but commercial power plants optimized for cost-efficiency and long-haul reliability probably don’t stack up to military reactors designed for maximum surge output. Lucrehulks are also incredibly unmanueverable, and while an Allegiance can’t dance like a Victory, it sure as hell would be able to evade much more return fire than the Lucrehulk. To make things even more lopsided, the Lucrehulk’s firing arcs are pretty awful, while an Allegiance would be able to pound it with its full armament, making this not really a contest. A single well-handled Imperator might even be able to take on a… Read more »

Zarrov
Guest
Zarrov

ISD version 2.0. Once presented next to each other this really looks like Allegiance class should be renamed ISD II. I never understood the lack of fighters on Allegiance. This is a huge ship, 2.2 km, it is unfathomable that they couldn’t squeeze in at least the same amount of fighters as ISD has. I get why lore-wise such decision was made but it seems not to make much sense.

gejemica
Guest
gejemica

Venators and ISDs are both middle-of-the road ships that are part battleship, part carrier.

The Venator steers more towards the carrier side, the ISD more towards the battleship side.

A dedicated carrier will always be more effective in that role than one that sacrifices hangar space for more firepower. A dedicated battleship will always be more effective in that role than one that sacrifices firepower for hangar space.

Take a Venator’s carrier side to the extreme and you get the Secutor.
Take the ISD’s battleship side to the extreme and you get the Allegiance.

Steve
Guest
Steve

Also Zarrov and gejemica you might wanna look at my post above your one with the headcanon idea for the Alliegiance.

PhantomFury
Guest
PhantomFury

Imperial combat doctrine (stemmed from Tarkin Doctrine) never paid much attention to the effectiveness of starfighter combat, as to them, the fighters isn’t the thing that win battles and conquer/hold systems, but rather the warships is the one with such a responsibility. Not to mention this ship is just full of anti-air batteries, additional hangar space is just a waste of interior that could be used for other things.

Valoren
Guest
Valoren

I think the allegiance actually has a small launch bay where the secondary shuttle bay would be on a standard ISD (which make sense really, there has to be a way for the crew to get in and out). No idea if it can accommodate fighters though…

Chris Bradshaw
Guest
Chris Bradshaw

It probably could fit a few fighters, just like you could potentially fit an AV-8B Harrier II in the hangar bay of a Burke destroyer IRL, but they don’t do that because fighter coverage for the fleet is better served by specialist vessels.

Sam
Guest

As 3D artist myself, I’ve never been able to get the sort of blue-gray material with the hull plates. Is it a bit too silly to ask for a hex value? 😛 I’ve gone all over google for hull plating textures etc, I’ve got a python script to generator plates and greebles, but where do you get these images from? Would you share them?

Ryadra777
Guest

Nice another redux done. There are 2 things I want to ask you about Fractal.
1. What the polygon count on this redux?
2. Will the Procursator get a redux as well?

Steven A Futrell
Guest
Steven A Futrell

id love to see you do the Titan class Stealth Dreadnought.

Steve
Guest
Steve

Stunningly good! There’s definately a brutal power to her clean lines!

Arvenski
Guest
Arvenski

That is incredible. My god.

RhysT
Guest
RhysT

Question. I know anything to do with the Sequel Trilogy is sorta a source of much controversy, but is there any chance we’ll eventually see ships from those movies depicted by you? Say the Resurgent class or something?

Daib
Guest
Daib

This thing has made it to 5+ EAW mods of varying caliber, and it’s laughably under-gunned in every single one of them.

gejemica
Guest
gejemica

Based on sheer volume it would be about 2 and a half times as powerful as an ISD, but the reactor is proportionally much bigger so who knows.

The important factor is that it looks pretty.

Phoenixx
Guest
Phoenixx

I’d say all except the EAW Remake-Light

That one it has 12 octuple barbette turbolasers, like 40-60 missile launchers as well as at least 20-50 minimum other light laser cannons, point defense or light turbolaser batteries.

Twitcheh
Guest
Twitcheh

SECONDED on the EAW Remake-Light version of the mod. Holy hell. That thing is a straight up beast. I’m late game right now, swapping ISD-II’s with them. Those missiles are definitely powerful.

Phoenixx
Guest
Phoenixx

Yeah easily one of the most cost effective and powerful ships in the mod and just a powerful ship in general.

And yeah it’s heavy missiles are no joke, still not as powerful as the super heavy ones the Kandosii has though.