5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
31 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ryadra777
2 years ago

So Fractal I notice about this Catamaran superlaser ship in your StarDestroyer.Net posts and there was your mock up model images of the ship on this post: http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?p=3055081#p3055081

But the links to these images seems to be gone for some reason. If you still have the mock up model of that ship could you show it here?

PhoenixKnight
PhoenixKnight
2 years ago
Reply to  Fractalsponge

Links are dead ish

Shaun Smakal
Shaun Smakal
2 years ago
Reply to  PhoenixKnight

Open them in a new tab. Worked for me.

Spoiler Alert: She chonky.

Ryadra777
2 years ago
Reply to  Fractalsponge

Nice mock up even it is a decade old one, I hope to see the updated one sooner or later if you want to.
The length of it seems to be around 3.5 Km.
As for the superlaser obviously it is not the Assertor’s version (which is 200 petatons per shot) so I guess it will be like 1/10 the power or less. (20 petatons or less per shot)

Ryadra777
2 years ago
Reply to  Fractalsponge

The 200 Petatons is from this post you made about the Assertor’s Superlaser power: http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?p=3222519#p3222519

The others are just me guessing the catamaran ship’s superlaser power and it’s length.

Robert Branca
2 years ago
Reply to  Fractalsponge

May you please make the starship ground vehicles and weapons emplacements of the 7,8,9 so that we can see them up close. Your artwork is excellent top of the line and completely out of this world man. I will respect a non if you chose that with upgraded specifications and full ones. Keep up with the near-perfection that is your work

Road Warrior
Road Warrior
2 years ago

This this would fit right in with Anon#3..

And I don’t mean that in a bad way!

Ryadra777
2 years ago
Reply to  Road Warrior

The Anon#3 star cruiser is a different ship from the Tyrant. Fractal said the Anon#3 will be designed as a pursuit cruiser which focus on escalation speed.
He even made a starting model of it like this:comment image

Road Warrior
Road Warrior
2 years ago
Reply to  Ryadra777

I know all that buddy. But thanks all the same.

Apologies, I was referencing the uniqueness of its hull shape

Ryadra777
2 years ago
Reply to  Road Warrior

It alright.

Ryadra777
2 years ago
Reply to  Fractalsponge

Hope to see you do that Fractal. As for the Interdictor Cruiser why not do that conversion on the Compellor? As it is bigger all around than the Tyrant and Anon#3 cruiser.

gorkmalork
gorkmalork
2 years ago
Reply to  Fractalsponge

Hm, so a pursuit interdictor well-armed/shielded enough to trap & duel destroyer-ballpark targets & fast enough to support cruiser squads from a safe distance? I could see Anon 3 handling that with aplomb against most CIS designs. Assuming the thing’s grav-well domes are even large enough to protrude, I’d stick ’em up alongside that ‘spar’ at the superstructure’s base.

Shaun Smakal
Shaun Smakal
2 years ago
Reply to  Fractalsponge

Also sounds like a good way to make some decent royalties ala selling it to the Corporate Sector.

PhantomFury
PhantomFury
2 years ago

No auxiliary drive on her? In any case, I really do feel her scale now that I’ve seen such a prominent sublight!

Sephiroth0812
Sephiroth0812
2 years ago

That “Mini-Fin” between the main engine thrusters is yet another subtle hint towards its late Republic origin. Not as prominent as in the Acclamators and Venators yet not completely gone as in the final designs and later pure Imperial vessels.
Another thing I noticed is that if you remove the ring structure, scale the whole hull down and switch out the bridge for an Acclamator one (design wise, not scale) you would probably get something very similar to the fanon Valiant-class Star Destroyer.

gorkmalork
gorkmalork
2 years ago
Reply to  Sephiroth0812

Speaking of late-Republic ship features: this thing’s Imperator I-esque bridge module now has me wondering what type of command-tower topping would be most likely for the Mandator line (or at least the -I; II & III *probably* weren’t packing Venator/Proclamator-style layouts).

Daib
Daib
2 years ago
Reply to  gorkmalork

The closest thing that Fractal has done to a Mandator is probably the Legator, so I wouldn’t be surprised if he just reused that bridge model.

PhoenixKnight
PhoenixKnight
2 years ago
Reply to  Daib

or the Bellator

gorkmalork
gorkmalork
2 years ago
Reply to  Daib

I’d be sorely tempted to slap the Venator’s double tower on a few early-build Mandator-Is for novelty, but you’re probably right.

Sephiroth0812
Sephiroth0812
2 years ago
Reply to  gorkmalork

In Legends there exists another model of Republic Battlecruiser, the Maelstrom-class, which is explicitly stated to have the Venator-style double bridges.

gorkmalork
gorkmalork
2 years ago
Reply to  Sephiroth0812

So at least three PT-era designs (and at least one mass-produced) with that flavor of command module. Neat.

Sephiroth0812
Sephiroth0812
2 years ago
Reply to  gorkmalork

According to Wookieepedia, the Maelstrom-class had “a long and thin delta-shaped hull and double command bridges perched over the stern.” Which is somewhat odd since it is stated to carry only 96 fighters, a veritable joke for a battlecruiser-grade vessel (but of course more than i.e. an Allegiance can field) and which puts into question why it would have the dual bridge design at all. It’s weaponry is impressive though so maybe the second bridge was for fire control and direction purposes rather than fighter coordination.

gorkmalork
gorkmalork
2 years ago
Reply to  Sephiroth0812

I have zero clue how much software/sensor space your average cruiser’s PD grid needs, but Clone Wars ships might’ve found the extra C&C handy for that & small-craft direction when dealing with droid swarms. Depending on the Maelstrom’s actual hangar shape/volume (which I *also* have zero idea about-only reference pic I found was dorsal), that number might also be an ‘Impstars can only fit a wing’-style lowball.

Chris Bradshaw
Chris Bradshaw
2 years ago
Reply to  gorkmalork

You could just have the scenario where the Maelstrom is designated as a battlecruiser under the Old Republic/Peacetime/Local Sector scale, just like the 1200m “Cruiser” Mon Cals.

Under the New Order/Wartime/Galactic scale that Saxton maximalists like, it might just be an overgrown line destroyer.

Sephiroth0812
Sephiroth0812
2 years ago
Reply to  Chris Bradshaw

Sadly there is no information on the length or reactor volume of this class, although Wookiepedia mentions a Maelstrom-vessel having 45,000 crew + 15.000 troops, possibly hinting at their ballpark. Although, considering the 600m Dreadnaught is stated to need a 16.000 crew while a much bigger Venator can do with a mere 7400 this probably isn’t a good comparison value. It does say however that the Maelstrom was introduced in 20 BBY, thus well into the Clone Wars already going so I doubt they would assign the Peacetime scale to the class.

Cdr. Rajh
Cdr. Rajh
2 years ago

Looks like this would be a perfect ship for my fleet~! I look forward to seeing her finished!