33
Leave a Reply

avatar
11 Comment threads
22 Thread replies
1 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
14 Comment authors
AnonymousRevanAlexNateErimar Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Revan
Guest
Revan

Do i see 24 concussion missile launcher? Also, what is the standard star fighter compliment of this ship?

Anonymous
Guest

Not Fractal but yeah they are missile launchers same with the Vindicator and the Fulgor.
As for the fighter compliment I do believe Fractal say it carry 2-3 fighter squadrons.

Nate
Guest
Nate

This would definitely be my ship of choice. The firing arcs are well thought out, so there aren’t any real weak spots. And since it’s meant to be an improvement on the Strike cruiser, I’m guessing the hangar complement is fairly customizable from space superiority to planetary assault.

Erimar
Guest
Erimar

WOW! very nice pic!
how big this ship is? smaller, bigger or about the same az an Acclamator-class?

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

So Fractal how would the Kontos fare against the Munificent?

DanielShenise
Guest

This and the sloop are still my favs.

gorkmalork
Guest
gorkmalork

Still love this thing’s hangar doors, half-recessed scanner dome & deep diamond hull plan, though hopefully its aft gunners get some extra flash protection.

Astro1derboy
Guest
Astro1derboy

Oh my word this is awesome!!

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

how long is it?

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Fractal put it at 546.2 meters but he originally he put it at 450 meters when he start making the Kontos.

Jonathan C.
Guest

Ahh that length is nice, something for the Vindicator as rough imperial equivalents to the MC30 and MC40 combo.

Erimar
Guest
Erimar

Didn’t see this…and asked for size. hmm…

Spaceman_28
Guest
Spaceman_28

Ever thought of Making a Venator-Class?
That would be cool.

Soren
Guest
Soren

Holy crap! This one totally steals the show for the 4k updates! Nice job fractal!

Chris Bradshaw
Guest
Chris Bradshaw

At this point I’d rather you just label it a Strike Cruiser, and hope someone at ILM or a new-canon writer stumbles upon it if someone wants to reintroduce the Strike Cruiser as they did the Secutor.

Valoren
Guest

Do you think ILM would put the Assertor in the new trilogy if Fractal were to rename it the giga super-star-destroyer ?

Chris Bradshaw
Guest
Chris Bradshaw

There’s clearly someone working on these new films that knows what they’re talking about in terms in terms of ship naming nomenclature who named the Mandator-IV even if he wasn’t allowed to design it, designated the Raddus as a heavy star cruiser, and pushed for calling the Resurgent a Star Battlecruiser instead of a destroyer. It’s a pity that person wasn’t given more creative control.

PhantomFury
Guest
PhantomFury

Funny you say that but yet Supremacy is…a star destroyer again.

gorkmalork
Guest
gorkmalork

I’m still chuckling over whomever slapped Assertor into the Imperial Handbook…with a caption explicitly referring to Executor. Way to credit *and* reference, minions of Mouse.

PhantomFury
Guest
PhantomFury

I saw that and got a chuckle at it too. However, going through the sources, Assertor was more widely used before Executor-class came into being, so I would have to guess that during the handbook’s lore-base publishing at 0 BBY, they presumed the Executor will be an Assertor-class?

gorkmalork
Guest
gorkmalork

As in-setting rationalizations go, that works-jives nicely with RL propaganda productions often missing sudden/recent developments.

gorkmalork
Guest
gorkmalork

Eh, I’d just chalk up the Loronar ship’s existence to a smaller company putting the bug in some Tagge-esque bigwig’s ear, and KDY in turn opting to slap that down with these puppies.