0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
10 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Xeno
Xeno
4 years ago

why’d you remove the second gun turret on each side?

gorkmalork
gorkmalork
4 years ago
Reply to  Xeno

Possibly ’cause the side turrets’ barrels stick out far enough to potentially compromise each others’ fields of fire. Plus, that aft gun can rotate far enough for a little broadside action.

Kris Huckle
Kris Huckle
4 years ago

Do you have any plans to do any land based vehicles?
Perhaps like another type of walker or something?
Great work on everything so far though, keep it up!

Anonymous
Anonymous
4 years ago
Reply to  Fractalsponge

Like the AT-ST, AT-AA(Anti-Air), AT-TE and the 2-M Saber class repulsor tank?

gorkmalork
gorkmalork
4 years ago

That dorsal anti-speeder(?) turret’s exceptionally spiffy-looking even by your standards. Incidentally, does recoil strike you as much of an issue for LTLs in atmosphere & mounted on something this compact?

gorkmalork
gorkmalork
4 years ago
Reply to  Fractalsponge

I’ll admit to a deeply dorky twinge of glee when Rogue One trotted out that prison-bus Juggy variant. And on further random tangents, the broadside placement of those TLs has me visualizing this thing in a terrain-following peek-a-boom duel with either similar platforms or something like the AT-SP.

Arvenski
Arvenski
4 years ago
Reply to  gorkmalork

“I’ll admit to a deeply dorky twinge of glee when Rogue One trotted out that prison-bus Juggy variant.” Oh yeah. I knew the fan service was off to a good start when I saw that.

gorkmalork
gorkmalork
4 years ago
Reply to  Arvenski

Sad thing is, I’m still itching for a Rebel-hijacked Jug-vs-AT-AT duel. Preferably involving the former T-boning the latter off a convenient cliff.