If I were to change one thing, it would be the tie racks, as they seem a bit too low, when one of the points of the tie racks was that they would allow a bunch of ties to be held in the hangar will still leaving ample space for other craft.
Vladis
1 year ago
Good day, maybe next will be Eclipse or Eclipse 2 SSD, sadly but almost not exist good art of this ship in internet
David Goff
1 year ago
Absolutely beautiful – I would 3d print and build that with lighting. To do it justice would need to be over 600mm / 24″ long – probably 1200mm / 48″ – in 8k Resin to accurately catch all the detail. Let me know if you plan on selling the 3d files.
I’m going away to count up and theorise on the number and size of ships it can hold in the numerous ray shielded landing bays. 😊
The Impellor is 3.55km long battlecarrier. Its power generation is 5.00E+25W, Shield load of 5.00E+26J, Sustained Throw Weight of 11950TT, acceleration of 3600Gs, has a fighter carrying capacity of 24 wings, and a troop complement of 1 corps.
hello everyone what do you think about the prydwen class battlecarrier ArtStation – Prydwen Class Battlecarrier it looks like a imperial upgrade to the Venator class star destroyer
Vladis
1 year ago
Hello Fractalsponge, all you works is very cool. This detail level is beyond awesomeness, how about try to art Warhammer 40k ships with this level of details? Maybe 26km gloriana class, or enormous ark mechanicus so large ships what they have gravity field as unstable moon, this will be so cool to see
Shaun
1 year ago
Anyone else notice the missing rear-facing quad MTL on the dorsal surface, starboard flank behind the bridge superstructure?
Spaceman45
1 year ago
The shots with the other ships remind me how much you nailed it on your tector. Of the few other models none of them change anything besides the no main bay. It’s one of my favorites along with the Impellor and the redux is beautiful! Love the shot with your tie racks(which is such an awesome system and the best version of tie racks I’ve seen). This ship is simply glorious and reminds me of a smaller Relentless from the fanfilm IMPS. You keep me a star wars fan Fractal!
Also Fractal or anyone who might know, is that all hangar aperture at the very front of each of the prongs facing forward? They look like slightly recessed hangars or maybe a venator esque runway?
Hard to tell. Could also be a space for resupply. Like the venators side bays. Also I don’t know who downvoted you lol. Wasn’t me
Ghazzy
1 year ago
Absolutely love this rendition, the Impellor is an impressive Fleet Carrier. The shot of one flanked by a Tector and an ISD is incredible. IF only we had a larger budget because I’d love to see these animated in motion sometime.
Anonymous
1 year ago
1728 fighters (4 groups, 6 wings to a group, 6 squadrons to a wing, 12 starfighters to a squadron) was the figure given on the page for the previous version. The current version looks like it has the same hanger layout, but a very slightly different turbolaser layout.
The Assertor has the same 1728 fighter standard capacity, and is specifically characterised as capable of carrying much less in the way of fighters than the Executor. It follows that the Executor, at least if fully loaded, carries vastly more than the Impellor.
I have always felt that due to the sheer SIZE and scope of the void that is the Executor’s Hangar that it is designed with an eye towards refit, repair and refuel of the escorting battlefleet. The bay is not large enough nor sheltered enough for FTL while anything is docked; but it has enough room for the necessary clamps/cranes to maneuver and replace turrets/sensor/shields of any ISDs attached to it. Sure it is not a true yard and swapping turrets is NOT ‘fix the frame’ but it is useful to get a pummeled ship back up and running enough to go for real repairs elsewhere.
This was always my head cannon for why the Executor’s fighter count was soooooo low. The rest is full of ship part foundry and maintenance gear.
Sharlin
1 year ago
How many fighters does this lass carry other than ‘yes’
I would say well north of 5000+ seeing as realistically the Executor could carry thousands, this lovely lass can no doubt carry way more.
If I were to change one thing, it would be the tie racks, as they seem a bit too low, when one of the points of the tie racks was that they would allow a bunch of ties to be held in the hangar will still leaving ample space for other craft.
Good day, maybe next will be Eclipse or Eclipse 2 SSD, sadly but almost not exist good art of this ship in internet
Absolutely beautiful – I would 3d print and build that with lighting. To do it justice would need to be over 600mm / 24″ long – probably 1200mm / 48″ – in 8k Resin to accurately catch all the detail. Let me know if you plan on selling the 3d files.
I’m going away to count up and theorise on the number and size of ships it can hold in the numerous ray shielded landing bays. 😊
The Impellor is 3.55km long battlecarrier. Its power generation is 5.00E+25W, Shield load of 5.00E+26J, Sustained Throw Weight of 11950TT, acceleration of 3600Gs, has a fighter carrying capacity of 24 wings, and a troop complement of 1 corps.
This comes from https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/12qGT-gtWGjBujsUjyXWbcBm59N84-NSH/edit?gid=215305764#gid=215305764
Not sure who made it, but it seems legit
hello everyone what do you think about the prydwen class battlecarrier ArtStation – Prydwen Class Battlecarrier it looks like a imperial upgrade to the Venator class star destroyer
Hello Fractalsponge, all you works is very cool. This detail level is beyond awesomeness, how about try to art Warhammer 40k ships with this level of details? Maybe 26km gloriana class, or enormous ark mechanicus so large ships what they have gravity field as unstable moon, this will be so cool to see
Anyone else notice the missing rear-facing quad MTL on the dorsal surface, starboard flank behind the bridge superstructure?
The shots with the other ships remind me how much you nailed it on your tector. Of the few other models none of them change anything besides the no main bay. It’s one of my favorites along with the Impellor and the redux is beautiful! Love the shot with your tie racks(which is such an awesome system and the best version of tie racks I’ve seen). This ship is simply glorious and reminds me of a smaller Relentless from the fanfilm IMPS. You keep me a star wars fan Fractal!
Also Fractal or anyone who might know, is that all hangar aperture at the very front of each of the prongs facing forward? They look like slightly recessed hangars or maybe a venator esque runway?
Is that a hangar? Or greebling?
Hard to tell. Could also be a space for resupply. Like the venators side bays. Also I don’t know who downvoted you lol. Wasn’t me
Absolutely love this rendition, the Impellor is an impressive Fleet Carrier. The shot of one flanked by a Tector and an ISD is incredible. IF only we had a larger budget because I’d love to see these animated in motion sometime.
1728 fighters (4 groups, 6 wings to a group, 6 squadrons to a wing, 12 starfighters to a squadron) was the figure given on the page for the previous version. The current version looks like it has the same hanger layout, but a very slightly different turbolaser layout.
The Assertor has the same 1728 fighter standard capacity, and is specifically characterised as capable of carrying much less in the way of fighters than the Executor. It follows that the Executor, at least if fully loaded, carries vastly more than the Impellor.
I have always felt that due to the sheer SIZE and scope of the void that is the Executor’s Hangar that it is designed with an eye towards refit, repair and refuel of the escorting battlefleet. The bay is not large enough nor sheltered enough for FTL while anything is docked; but it has enough room for the necessary clamps/cranes to maneuver and replace turrets/sensor/shields of any ISDs attached to it. Sure it is not a true yard and swapping turrets is NOT ‘fix the frame’ but it is useful to get a pummeled ship back up and running enough to go for real repairs elsewhere.
This was always my head cannon for why the Executor’s fighter count was soooooo low. The rest is full of ship part foundry and maintenance gear.
How many fighters does this lass carry other than ‘yes’
I would say well north of 5000+ seeing as realistically the Executor could carry thousands, this lovely lass can no doubt carry way more.
Executor is 19km. Impellor is 3.5km.
iirc the standard complement for the Impellor is 24 wings, at least pre-redux.
you can probably stuff more fighters at the expense of deployment speed and maintenance gear
What are the stats on this? Looks absolutely awesome.
:00000 those hangars are beautiful
Love the shot into the hangers
Is there a known complement for the ship?
This is a fantastic redux…love the side-by-side shots with the Compellor.